The paradox of the AI era is simple: because we can now build and generate anything instantly, execution has become cheap. The only true differentiator left is the ability to generate unique ideas.

​But this is exactly where the trap lies. AI and social media induce a “smooth brain” state—a mental laziness fed by clean, isolated roads guided by algorithms.

​You cannot spark new ideas inside a sterile feedback loop. True creativity requires the friction of real life, the chaos of the open web, and the variety of actual experience. You need to get your hands dirty and make mistakes, not just consume safe, generated outputs.

​Ultimately, the advantage belongs to those who reject AI as a substitute for free will, human thinking, and imagination. It belongs to those who embrace the “try-and-fail” flow. The winners will be those who treat AI strictly as a utility—a tool to use only after the messy, human work of ideation is done.

​Generating content is no longer the problem. The problem is the ability to create ideas—that is where variety of experience, deep understanding, and human nuance are truly needed.

One response to “The easier AI makes it to generate content, the harder it becomes to generate original ideas”

  1. A

    The Argument: “What if I ask AI to generate ideas and sort them?”
    The Critique: This does not make your text dumb. In fact, it reinforces your point, but it changes the definition of “work.”
    ​If you ask AI to “generate 100 ideas and pick the best one,” who defines what “best” means?
    ​If the AI defines “best”: It will pick the most statistically probable “good” idea. This is the definition of mediocre. It is the “smooth brain” outcome.
    ​If YOU define “best”: You still need life experience, friction, and “messy” reality to have the Taste to know which idea is actually good.
    ​Conclusion: AI can generate options, but it cannot generate taste.

    ..the danger of losing the human experiences that build that taste

Leave a Reply