Intuition is, first and foremost, a feeling. It isn’t a mood or a whim, but a mind-sense—caught by opening inward, the way a faint scent is noticed before it’s named. Phenomenologically, it arrives pre-conceptually: a pressure toward “this is so” before reasons assemble. Epistemically, it is compressed knowledge—patterns distilled by memory, embodiment, and attention—unfolded later by analysis. In that sense intuition is a kind of time-reversed understanding: we know first; we explain after.
It sits just beyond ordinary consciousness yet within it, like the horizon is beyond you but still part of the sky you see. Because it is a feeling, it can be trained and it can mislead. Fear can masquerade as clarity; habit can echo as certainty. The task isn’t to worship intuition or to distrust it, but to calibrate it—through exposure to reality, honest feedback, and the discipline of asking, “What would make me wrong?”
Intuition is not the opposite of reason; it is reason’s scout. It ranges ahead, brings back a signal, and hands it to concepts for verification. When mature, it carries a signature: quiet, steady, un-dramatic. When immature, it shouts. Learn the difference, keep your attention open, and your intuitions become less like guesses and more like the mind’s sense of smell—subtle, swift, and surprisingly exact.
Leave a Reply