The functioning of societies and economies is defined far more by systems than by individual people. Markets, laws, and shared values create an organized structure that distributes resources, opportunities, and influence. It is not particular individuals that hold the ultimate power, but rather the mechanisms of these systems themselves.

A system of market sharing, collective values, law enforcement, and mutual loyalty determines who becomes a billionaire and who remains a worker—even when the worker might be equally capable or, at times, even smarter. Often, circumstances combined with the flow of systemic forces elevate one person over another. In truth, only a small fraction of the population is extraordinarily talented, a small fraction is truly unwise, and the vast majority are just normal, simply moves with the currents that systems create.

Recognizing and understanding these systems—how they operate, evolve, and influence individuals—is the key to understanding society itself. Individual actions rarely shift the system in a significant way, but the system continuously shapes individuals, their opportunities, and their choices.

People accumulate influence and affect one another in small, intricate ways, but fear—of loss, of death, of being cast out—often prevents serious resistance to established systems. In many authoritarian contexts, the majority of people become blind to the illusion of shared participation, not realizing that the system serves itself rather than them.

Ultimately, the core insight is simple: systems govern people more than people govern systems, and seeing this truth is the first step toward understanding the world.

Emotion—not logic—that’s how post-capitalist, informational, networked societies are being driven (if not swung or dragged).

It’s sharpened, hyperbolized; it’s neither bad nor good—it’s just accelerated. Acceptance and adaptation, strategic corrections—that’s what should be done, not blaming or denying

Generally speaking, we’re stuck—if not degrading. Some small areas may be seeing progress, but overall our civilization has gained very little in recent decades.

Compare 70s, 80s, 90s. Such big jumps in progress even just visually. Cars, politics, technology.

Now check 00s, 10s, 20s. It’s all almost the same since start of 00s/end of 90s, but even worse. Internet, cars designs, no fresh political freedoms, etc.

Among the few new ideas, are you really sure you need all that AI slop in your life? Enshitification of everything, even american power?

It’s going to happen something really bad before people understand and reload.

Late stage capitalism’s core flaw is the relentless greedy pursuit of money and power, which erodes freedom. Without freedom, progress stalls; there’s no space or time to create.

Sometimes we still can make fancy things today, but most of them grew from a spirit of freedom and quality—not the corporate bloat that dominates too much.

That pursuit, that greed of capitalism, is something we need sometimes to speed things up. However, it’s also crucial to balance that with a proper understanding of human nature, society, the nature of restrictions and freedom.

And It’s always good to remember the downside of rapid advancement: pollution and entropy.

Intuition is, first and foremost, a feeling. It isn’t a mood or a whim, but a mind-sense—caught by opening inward, the way a faint scent is noticed before it’s named. Phenomenologically, it arrives pre-conceptually: a pressure toward “this is so” before reasons assemble. Epistemically, it is compressed knowledge—patterns distilled by memory, embodiment, and attention—unfolded later by analysis. In that sense intuition is a kind of time-reversed understanding: we know first; we explain after.

It sits just beyond ordinary consciousness yet within it, like the horizon is beyond you but still part of the sky you see. Because it is a feeling, it can be trained and it can mislead. Fear can masquerade as clarity; habit can echo as certainty. The task isn’t to worship intuition or to distrust it, but to calibrate it—through exposure to reality, honest feedback, and the discipline of asking, “What would make me wrong?”

Intuition is not the opposite of reason; it is reason’s scout. It ranges ahead, brings back a signal, and hands it to concepts for verification. When mature, it carries a signature: quiet, steady, un-dramatic. When immature, it shouts. Learn the difference, keep your attention open, and your intuitions become less like guesses and more like the mind’s sense of smell—subtle, swift, and surprisingly exact.