.

  • Subjects and essense of cultural code

    At the root, at the core, each person is unique.
    On top, however, it is superficially covered with a cultural code… like a set of clothes, a garment, it reflects many of the movements and character of the individual, the garment is most often what is given, but sometimes it is what the individual chooses.
    A complex mixture of cultural codes is possible. Rotten elements might be present within, as well as magical mutations. It’s akin to the DNA but in the information world of humans.
    The erasure or correction of a code in its entirety or nuance is possible too. The code applies to societies, the groups that carry the code.
    It is all information and pieces of reflected, partly post factum mutated reality.

    Comments / Sharing: Subjects and essense of cultural code
  • Sentiment Ressentiment

    An eternal engine of social development, the strong-smart are few… the weak are many, sometimes smart wins, sometimes weak masses wins.
    The weak, the masses, they pull their morality in different ways. For example soviet and post soviet Russia, it is clearly an entity of the weak, the resentment class – their amoral mindset and action lack the true desire to real power, to surpass in real… but only to prolong the comfort position, to make slaves of others.
    Reasons, motives, expediency of actions – these are the areas where this viscous meta-driver code of personality can be discerned.
    en.wikipedia.org/Master-slave_morality
    I would add: what is morality of slaves – it is a thought without social perspective.
    Comments / Sharing: Sentiment Ressentiment
  • What is Logic

    Logic is symmetry of ideas or concepts; abstract roots, deep essence, like the numbers.
    Comments / Sharing: What is Logic
  • 985838822

    It’s always more about the wisdom of limitations.

    A hard leader is only bad when he’s stupid and untalented.

    Forceful promotion of good ideas, even if sacrifices have to be made, is always well received by people lately.

    In short, the main thing is the idea, reasoning and strength, where it leads. Ideas of total freedom and democracy are illusory – most often such things end up in banal mess. We still need to filter out the most talented individuals for the roles of political leaders, not mediocre.

    Comments / Sharing: 985838822
  • A version

    I made a remix of an old Ethiopian track from my audio cassettes archive.

    Comments / Sharing: A version
  • Philosophy is a metaprogramming

    Philosophy is a metaprogramming of the director’s block – of the i, the reason.

    Comments / Sharing: Philosophy is a metaprogramming
  • Amplification of the new

    I’ve recently made a small invention for myself, a method to improve the originality of melodies. When I create music or melodies I just play notes on the music keyboard to find perfection, it’s not about drawing on paper like in the past. I record them, look for the right combination and then edit.

    So one of the ways today to improve the originality of a piece of art, either music or anything else, as you realized first of all I’m talking about music or art, – is the way of varying the spontaneity of movement during the creation process. It doesn’t have to be the hand, it can be a technical device or whatever.

    You have to try to make a new, original movement, a sudden leap in an unusual place, or a stretch where you wouldn’t expect it. A leap, a discontinuity or stretch, a variation in the temporal. It is, after all, the flow of time.

    Apparently, something similar to randomization of context in creation is also done by nature – for example, mutations in DNA are a spontaneous factor, the factor of randomness, shuffling and over-shuffling is present.

    Comments / Sharing: Amplification of the new
  • Symmetry in aesthetics

    Why are rhymes appealing? It’s their symmetry. Symmetry is profound, similar to number and math, and it’s present in all aspects of the universe, from subatomic to macro cosmic.

    In human existence and creativity, the preference is typically around 80/20 in favor of order and symmetry. However, a small element of chaos exists within us, which is crucial for maintaining a balanced aesthetic.

    Comments / Sharing: Symmetry in aesthetics
  • Workflow

    From time to time I can miss a day or something, but I do not put much pressure on myself about that. It’s OK to miss the target sometimes. But a general flow must be established. Understanding habits is a must.

    Comments / Sharing: Workflow
  • Things of good quality that last long

    Things of good quality that last long are much better for emotions and environment and other better saving than buying a new top smartphone each year. Personally, I use some vintage old tech just because it works well; why hurry with upgrades and overconsumption, just why.

    Comments / Sharing: Things of good quality that last long
  • Ideas in vacuum

    In a vacuum, any object tends to continue doing what it’s doing. By acquiring mass, a particle… Ideas are the reflection of mass information or?

    Comments / Sharing: Ideas in vacuum
  • Techno-Feudalism

    Such a view might sound logically correct, addressing why the next stage involves all that discussion about free software. Recently, I wrote about the concepts of free code in contrast to the market. I perceive the situation of techno-feudalism as an unbalanced disproportionately influenced by initial setup of digital world.

    However, I think it will eventually balance itself out with protests against markets that lack freedom. I have already distanced myself from anything related to big tech, preferring the quality and flexibility of free software and hardware. It has perspective. It’s evident that the overgrown nature of big tech can only lead to imbalance and suffering. A better balanced, open, decentralized approach is needed.

    https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/11/12/2336255/is-capitalism-dead-yanis-varoufakis-argues-capitalists-are-now-vassals-to-techno-feudalists

    Greek economist/politician Yanis Varoufakis “was briefly Greek finance minister in 2015,” remembers the Conversation. Now his new book asks the question, “What killed capitalism,” with the title’s first word providing an answer.

    “Techno-feudalism.”


    Varoufakis argues that we no longer live in a capitalist society… “Today, capitalist relations remain intact, but techno-feudalist relations have begun to overtake them,” writes Varoufakis. Traditional capitalists, he proposes, have become “vassal capitalists”. They are subordinate and dependent on a new breed of “lords” — the Big Tech companies — who generate enormous wealth via new digital platforms. A new form of algorithmic capital has evolved — what Varoufakis calls “cloud capital” — and it has displaced “capitalism’s two pillars: markets and profits”.

    Markets have been “replaced by digital trading platforms which look like, but are not, markets”. The moment you enter amazon.com “you exit capitalism” and enter something that resembles a “feudal fief”: a digital world belonging to one man and his algorithm, which determines what products you will see and what products you won’t see. If you are a seller, the platform will determine how you can sell and which customers you can approach. The terms in which you interact, share information and trade are dictated by an “algo” that “works for [Jeff Bezos’] bottom line”…

    Access to the “digital fief” comes at the cost of exorbitant rents. Varoufakis notes that many third-party developers on the Apple store, for example, pay 30% “on all their revenues”, while Amazon charges its sellers “35% of revenues”. This, he argues, is like a medieval feudal lord sending round the sheriff to collect a large chunk of his serfs’ produce because he owns the estate and everything within it.

    There is “no disinterested invisible hand of the market” here. The Big Tech platforms are exempted from free-market competition.

    And in the meantime, users are unknowingly training their algorithms for them — so “In this interaction, we are all high-tech ‘cloud serfs’… [T]he ‘cloud capital’ we are generating for them all the time increases their capacity to generate yet more wealth, and thus increases their power — something we have only begun to realise.”

    Approximately 80% of the income of traditional capitalist conglomerates go to salaries and wages, according to Varoufakis, while Big Tech’s workers, in contrast, collect “less than 1% of their firms’ revenues”… For Varoufakis, we are not just living through a tech revolution, but a tech-driven economic revolution. He challenges us to come to terms with just what has happened to our economies — and our societies — in the era of Big Tech and Big Finance.

    Comments / Sharing: Techno-Feudalism
  • Emotional Thinking

    Why do people support charismatic but misguided leaders today? Why is there a rise in populism in politics? The post-modern era has led most people to think and choose based on emotions, not rationality, similar to advertising techniques that focus on stimulation rather than conscious thought. This leads to various problems.

    Emotional thinking isn’t inherently wrong. Sometimes, it’s necessary, especially in personal situations where we need to drive a movement, with a framework of rational thought around it. However, for broader societal matters, rational, critical, and slow thinking is essential.

    We should never blindly trust the words of politicians or celebrities. Always ask questions, check facts, and remember that their statements might be primarily motivated by profit. But ultimately, we must seek the truth, because, in the long run, truth is the only genuine profit.

    Comments / Sharing: Emotional Thinking
  • Xiph Icecast Directory

    http://dir.xiph.org – “a directory of internet radio stations and other live streams using the Icecast Streaming Server”

    Comments / Sharing: Xiph Icecast Directory
  • Open source and proprietary software: when is appropriate & a little about the excess

    On one hand, open source is always better; you know what the program is doing and can improve it… But on the other hand, developers need to earn a living. Indeed, it’s ridiculous to work for free, as one can easily die of hunger, lose motivation… Programming can bring pleasure in itself, but it’s not as fan as music or sport.
    I see the situation this way. Logically, the very first question arises, the first claim against proprietary code, “better knowing what the program does,” but actually this mainly concerns privacy.
    If there’s absolutely no internet access, a completely offline box for strictly practical purposes, like audio or video creation, databases, local systems… it can be proprietary because for base user it doesn’t really matter what’s inside the fridge or synthesizer as long as it doesn’t connect to the internet or camera, personal data, or spy, if it can repaired as well.
    But if there are components that directly or indirectly involve personal data, areas that can be abused, with direct access to a user’s inner life or the internet in general, access to microphones or cameras… these things must be open, documented, with source code visible. How developers can make money from such – there are options… additional features, selling hardware, extended support, merchandise, subscriptions, compiled and optimized versions. Think of more.
    If you just make code, for example for yourself or out of interest, that’s also great and noble. Overall, chasing excessive profit is vulgar. Why do you need so much money, for luxury..? An excess of funds is not exactly a good thing; it’s clearly imbalanced, though here one could argue.
    In general, excess spoils average people. A rare intelligent and self-controlled person – most likely, will do charity, but the average person, more likely than not, will become worse.
    Comments / Sharing: Open source and proprietary software: when is appropriate & a little about the excess