some Philosophical aphorisms & critical reflectionS
For me it’s all very simple: the more complicated it becomes, the more fragile it will be.
What is beauty? Why do some faces captivate one person but not another?
Beauty is always partly subjective — shaped by the observer’s inner world.
Can a computer create a beautiful girl? Maybe. But usually, it’s just an attractive one. True beauty reflects something personal — something uniquely yours.
Earth is the genius planet, there are so few of them. So many unique combinations of factors. Take care of it, love it.
If it’s more challenging, it’s also more interesting.
“State level” has potential—an entity to maintain basic universal needs like the internet and social websites, media libraries, with open-source code and a decentralized nature. When you pay your part, it’s as though you’re contributing to the whole, fundamental access; it’s bad when the gigantism of private corporations takes over basic levels.
Such flows can get diluted by scale; compact communities are more stable.
Before you say luck doesn’t love you, make sure that you bought enough lottery tickets
You don’t know the future not because you don’t know it, but simply because it hasn’t happened yet, it just doesn’t exist yet.
What if the essence of life is not in the combinations themselves, but in the act of combining?
In the relentless pursuit of possibilities, perhaps the true value lies not in the attainment of a perfect state but in the journey of self-discovery and growth that emerges from the trials and tribulations.
Thus, the imperfect, transient combinations are the fragments that shape our ongoing narrative, teaching us resilience, acceptance, and the beauty of the ephemeral.
Unusual but high-quality films are remembered stronger and brighter than the same high-quality ones – but ordinary ones.
Like a child learning to draw from their first conscious actions, or like early humans who began creating art from their first awareness.
So too, it seems, that civilization as a whole can have an age, just like a living being. There are early stages, turbulent adolescence, experimental and aggressive youth, stable growth, maturity, and a gradual transition into void.
Our civilization today exists somewhere around the equivalent of a 16-year-old teenager—eagerly discovering new things, yet aggressive and still unable to grasp the deeper essence of existence.
The Industrial Revolution ended with two world wars.
We now face a more complex and dense revolution: the Information Revolution.
Everything will change drastically and quickly, inevitably with some casualties.
Effective strategies for today – stoicism and minimalism.
One of core essence of humanity lies in working with experience — including making mistakes and trying new things.
This is something not provided in the context of facing reality: the need to try and understand this reality, to endure — not something well structured, like for machines.
It seems there might be several types of intelligence which can integrate and support each other. If two super intelligences meet, why fight when you can talk?
What you primarily to pass on as knowledge to the next generation is experience with reality, a legacy of reasonable data which is always something related to this.
I would not say anything related to computers is an another reality, it is this reality, just another level of it.
The aggressor must be struck back. If you give them what they want, they will only demand more and cause more harm.
Aggression and arrogance must be met with a firm response.
The idea of strength as the main value comes from a shallow understanding of the complexity of human society and its interactions.
True strength is not just force, but wide-reaching flexibility and balance. What is force without balance?
Why? It’s the only way of the stable evolution. Whole life is not about killing each other, it’s about symbiosis.
Why do people often value more highly the creations attributed to a single individual — sometimes even reforming and simplifying what was made by a group into the vision of one?
Often the value forms itself under the image of one creator even if there was a team or any other complexity behind it – there is a simplification of the creation of value, but this image of the creator largely influences value itself due to its clarity; it reflects the reflection of the human interest of man in man as an inseparable part of human existence.
When a cultural product is generated by someone unknown – not individual but a structure, it may elicit a rejection in its perspective; it might lack value forming based on the mentioned simplicity and the deep underlayed within us the human-seek-human factor.
In context of modern world’s relentless pursuit for novelty, the human factor might seem to become mundane, yet it remains one of the key elements of forming cultural values in general as still there is no best thing we ever meet as our closest one – the human being.
This is not a newspaper or a personal blog.
This is a philosophical project, and to get better results, I look at everything from above or at a specific angle.
That’s why I intentionally avoid any names or events.
With this approach, I gain greater clarity. As a sensitive musician and artist, I also try to avoid taking an emotional perspective, as it can distort the truth and hinder definition.
I see my philosophical goal clearly: to find a way to understand better and gain insightful perspectives on being in general.
I might be wrong: I do not know everything, but I try hard to be as critical as I can and also remain honest.
The internet is already so noisy. I know it can be boring or strange but still, my defined style is to proceed without any names or day-to-day analysis of the chaos we see around these days.
Despite that, I’m still taking an actual perspective, but with the mentioned balanced approach.
Dialectically scanning all possible options, evaluating the thesis that all ideas are born at the intersection of the internal model of the mind with the external – real world, one might argue:
Let’s say a science fiction writer comes up with idea of another planet where instead of complex life there is a one big reasonable ocean. Such a thing does not exist in reality as we might know. But there are initial prototypes – intelligence, life, and ocean, these beginnings were laid at the start, and when the writer felt the necessity to synthesize this mixture from the previously absorbed experience; and it came into contact with reality. Reality still serves as the foundation for this concept.
If we isolate the mind from external influences, what thoughts could it generate? Emptiness, introspection?
What could be pure reason’s speculations within itself? Synthesizing concepts, but from what? All of them still emerge as re-actions.
But what is that necessity? It seems that it is simply the movement of the mind as it is, in other words, when the waves move – they move; everything moves and if it moves – it somehow changes, and therefore is subjected to influence and influences. When the mind is strong, its movements reach far.
A hypothetical super-mind in a vacuum? What would the mind be without the experience, reality, and stability of its own world model? Perhaps a better starting point is to consider what lies beyond – the energy and space.
An idea doesn’t exist in the physical world; it is a mental construct developed in response to an encounter with reality.
For example, the concept of numbers, one of the most profound and far reading ideas, was created as an abstraction by the mind to interpret complexity. One of the most fundamental techniques of the mind is to subdivide reflections into smaller parts for examination.
The intersection of the mind’s internal model with the external reality is where ideas are conceived.
To quiet the mind, make a clear distinction between yourself and its inner motor. Stop yourself at first, but you can’t control the entire movement of the mind—so just allow the motor to spin down the rest on its own.
Inspiration is more about the energetic state of mind rather than the ideational, the semantic.
When ideas have properly signed the mind, like matching keys, but mainly when the mind itself has reached a top state, especially in a general, physical sense, then there will be wonderful results brought about by inspiration.
The idea of what you truly like is one of the first impulses boosting energy in forming inspiration. However, the overall underlying context here is usually broader and lies somewhat deeper as it is partly hidden in the subconscious streams.
True inspiration is a cutting-edge blend of glowing will to the world, that is, a power.
It’s good to always remember: everything is temporary; the essence of the world is to constantly evolve.
“Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question.” – Niels Bohr
abstract Aesthetic aesthetics AI analysis art Attention authoritarianism authority balance brain capitalism Chances chaos complexity Consciousness consumerism creativity critical thinking cultural code culture death Decentralization development emotions ethics evil evolution existence Experience fascism feelings flow fortune freedom future general philosophy human being humanity human nature ideas Illusions information intellect internet Life logic luck market masses mind minimalism mittnetworkmusic money morality motivation movement Music My Life nature noise open source People perception personal growth perspectives Philosophy Philosophy of Life politics Power privacy progress psychology quality random randomness reality reason reflections sense simplicity Society space stoicism style Success suffering systems Tech technology the reason Things time truth understanding universal basic income Universe values Will wisdom
